California Governor Jerry Brown thought he only had a $28 billion 'wall of debt' to deal with, but it turns out it is much larger. From the NY Times:
Second, it is important to keep figures like California's estimated $335 billion debt in perspective. According to Wikipedia, California has the world's ninth largest economy with a 2010 gross state product (GSP) of $1.9 trillion, or 13% of the United States gross domestic product. Assuming the top end $335 billion debt figure is accurate that works out to only a 17% debt to GDP ratio for the state. Compare that with Japan's and U.S. federal governments's approximately 225% and 100% debt to GDP ratio's, respectively.
Having said that, the significance of these new debt estimates should not be underestimated, particularly when you consider how politically difficult it has been for Brown and the California legislature to address a shortfall which was estimated as a small fraction of the true debt.
Other than the NY Times article, which was cross-published at CNBC, this news is getting zero attention. This is somewhat surprising given that the independent panel includes former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker. However, I couldn't find anything on either the LA Times or the San Francisco Chronicle's website on this topic.
Directors of the State Budget Crisis Task Force said their researchers had found a lot of other debts that did not turn up in California’s official tally. Much of it involved irrevocable promises to provide pensions to public workers, health care for retirees, the cost of delayed highway maintenance and an estimated $40 billion bill to bring drinking water up to federal standards.
They also pointed out many of the same unpaid bills from previous years that the governor had brought to light, like $8 billion in delayed payments to schools and community colleges, and $250 million that was raided from a fund dedicated to transportation and treated as revenue.
The task force estimated that the burden of debt totaled at least $167 billion and as much as $335 billion. Its members warned that the off-the-books debts tended to grow over time, so that even if Mr. Brown should succeed in pushing through his tax increase, gaining an additional $50 billion over the next seven years, the wall of debt would still be there, casting its shadow over the state.First, $40 billion for drinking water? As a longtime Bay Area resident I've regularly sung the praises of San Francisco's water and had no idea the rest of the state's water was so far off the mark.
Second, it is important to keep figures like California's estimated $335 billion debt in perspective. According to Wikipedia, California has the world's ninth largest economy with a 2010 gross state product (GSP) of $1.9 trillion, or 13% of the United States gross domestic product. Assuming the top end $335 billion debt figure is accurate that works out to only a 17% debt to GDP ratio for the state. Compare that with Japan's and U.S. federal governments's approximately 225% and 100% debt to GDP ratio's, respectively.
Having said that, the significance of these new debt estimates should not be underestimated, particularly when you consider how politically difficult it has been for Brown and the California legislature to address a shortfall which was estimated as a small fraction of the true debt.
Other than the NY Times article, which was cross-published at CNBC, this news is getting zero attention. This is somewhat surprising given that the independent panel includes former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker. However, I couldn't find anything on either the LA Times or the San Francisco Chronicle's website on this topic.
