Video: A Simple, 8-Minute Explanation of What's Wrong With Mainstream Economics

Below is NOVA's longer but also recommended explanation of what's wrong with mainstream economics.

 

Video: Ferguson, Rattner, Murray, etc. on What's Happened to the American Dream?

Video: Review of 4-Part Frontline Financial Crisis Series 'Money, Power, and Wall St.'

The PolyCapitalist is kicking May off with a number of must watch videos, and this epic 4-part Frontline special follows the crisis from what is arguably its point of genesis: a 1994 JP Morgan retreat in Boca Raton, Florida which of led to the creation of the first credit default swaps.

Frontline has done an incredible job getting many of the key players and insiders, including a number of top Wall St. bankers, to go on record about what happend. Even if you've read all the books, seen the earlier Frontline financial crisis special, and think you know all you need to about the financial crisis, this is still must watch.

The big new item for me, and I'm a bit surprised this has not received more ink, was the March 2009 battle between Larry Summers and Tim Geithner over what to do with the megabanks. My prior understanding was that Summers and Geithner were two peas in a pod. Not always it turns out.

According to Frontline, in March 2009 Summers, along with fellow economist Chritina Romer, pushed for what was called 'Old Testament Justice', meaning firing a bank CEO and or possibly nationalizing one of the megabanks. In contrast, Geithner, who it would appear is more of a protege of Bob Rubin than Summers, fought hard to treat the banks with kid gloves and use stress tests to help instill confidence back into the marketplace.

Obama ultimately sided with Geithner, which seems to contradict earlier reporting that Geithner had ignored Obama's instructions to dissolve Citigroup. Frontline definitely presents Summers in a better light and Geithner and Obama in a worse one.

I have only a minor gripe with this Frontline series, which is the annoying editing. In a multi-part, complex story, reusing clips to aid telling the story is probably unavoidable. However, I felt they recycled too many from within the four part series, as well as from an earlier Frontline special on the financial crisis from a couple years ago. But this is a minor, forgivable quibble given the extraordinary job the Frontline team did to compile and document the crisis up through present day.

Overall, perhaps the key point made in the series - and one I could not agree more with - is that the financial crisis still has not ended. Where it will go from here is as much dependent now on politics as markets or economics.

Video: El-Erian, Buiter, Warsh, etc. on Economic Growth

This is another excellent panel from the Milken Institute Conference. It has a somewhat more investment focus than the previous one posted with discussion/predictions on the Eurozone (Greece in or out), elections, interes rates, etc.

Video: Raghuram Rajan, Niall Ferguson, etc. on The Future of Capitalism

This video from the Milken Institute Conference unfortunately appears to begin after the panel has already begun and cuts abruptly, but still features a very good discussion of economic issues in the U.S., Asia, and Europe.

How Some U.S. States Subsidize Other States

With the political battle over government spending raging across the globe the story of how some U.S. states are subsidizing others is getting more attention.

Here is a good post on this topic from the NY Times Economix blog with several useful links, as well as the below chart showing how much extra federal spending each state receives beyond each federal tax dollar paid into the federal government by that same state's taxpayers.

(click to enlarge)

And here is a map plotting the above data.

(click to enlarge)

From the chart and map you can see that in 2005 the state of New Mexico received back over twice the amount of money it paid into the federal government. 

In contrast, the state of New Jersey received $0.61 back on every dollar it paid into the federal government. 

In short, the New Jerseyans are subsidizing the New Mexicans via tax transfers conducted at the federal level.

Another observation is that just 17 states received back less than what they paid in while 32 received more back (Rhode Island received back exactly what it paid in). In other words, a minority of states are subsidizing the majority.

More from the NY Times:

Readers contemplating the table will discover in it a certain paradox — that those residents who most often denounce big government and call for sharp cuts in government spending often benefit themselves from such spending or live in regions that receive significant government support. This was also noted by the Tax Foundation. In presenting the data in the form of a geographic map, the foundation wryly observes: 

As you can see from the map, states that get the “worst deal” — that is, have the lowest ratio of federal spending to taxes paid — are generally high-income states either on the coasts or with robust urban areas (such as Illinois and Minnesota). Perhaps not coincidentally, these “donor” states also tend to vote for Democrat candidates in national elections. Similarly, many states that get the “best deal” are lower-income states in the Midwest and South with expansive rural areas that tend to vote Republican.

In other words, there is correlation between the above map and the below map which shows general U.S. Presidential voting patterns for Republicans (dark red solidly Republican, light red leans Republican) and Democrats (dark blue solidly Democrat, light blue leans Democrat), and white states a toss up.

Bottom line: the subject of some states, which primarily vote Democrat in the Presidential election, subsidizing Republican voting states is a topic that could generate significant political friction in the years ahead.

Video: Debt and Redemption Documentary

At the risk of sounding trite it's often helpful to put a face and voice behind the news.

This short documentary by VPRO, which does excellent work overall btw, has some good coverage of the fallout from the dealings by both small and large Italian municipalities in derivatives like interest rate swaps. And if terms like 'derivative' turn you off but you're still interested in learning more and trying to understand the financial crisis, then video is particularly recommended.

Interviews include the Rolling Stone's Matt Tabibbi, Brooklyn based investor-blogger Reggie Middleton, and former IMF Chief Economist and Professor Simon Johnson.

The most interesting fact from the documentary for me was learning how the City of Milan agreed to be on the hook financially to a bank in the event of a debt default by Italy (the nation state).

Are there any other municipalities which have contractually guaranteed the debt of a sovereign state?

'Government Bank Bailout Was Profitable' Myth Receives Another Nail in the Coffin

Bravo to Jonathan Weil of Bloomberg, who uses the U.S. Treasury's own footnotes and figures to dispel the myth that the bank bailouts were profitable to taxpayers here.

Video: Simon Johnson's White House Burning

Why is the U.S. Government Still Hiding Financial Crisis Documents?

Here here to former Lazard partner turned Wall St. author/historian William Cohan and his fighting the good fight to obtain public documents from the U.S. government related to financial firms such as Goldman Sachs.